When I’m visiting Manchester City Art Gallery I tend to seek out some favourite works, one of which is a small painting of a young woman dressed in blue reading a letter. A simple portrayal but it always attracts my attention with its fine draughtsmanship, subdued, pastel colours, its weathered, almost washed out look, and the quiet, contemplative pose of the model, who seems to be completely absorbed by the letter, giving it all her attention, unaware that she is being observed. It’s by the Welsh painter Gwen John, one of two of her works in the Manchester collection. A few weeks ago when I was in Manchester city centre and popped into the Gallery I couldn’t find it or the other painting by the artist. I assumed they had been put into storage. But I was wrong.
When I was in Edinburgh last Tuesday, after my walk up Arthur’s Seat I made my way across the city centre to Modern Two, one of the two galleries focusing on Modern and Contemporary Art, both in grand 19th Century Buildings close to Dean Village. Modern 1 holds the permanent collection while Modern 2 shows temporary exhibitions, the current one being a major retrospective of the work of Gwen John, Gwen John: Strange Beauties. The exhibition has gathered together works from galleries and private collections so, not surprisingly, both the Manchester portraits were on display.
As she was a Welsh artist, the National Museum in Cardiff has a good selection of her works, which I saw during a visit in 2012. Not surprisingly many of them were included in the Edinburgh exhibition.
A quick word about the gallery building. It used to be the Dean Orphanage, the site of an orphans’ home until the 1990s. The building features in popular literature, in particular in The Lewis Man, the second book of the Lewis trilogy by Peter May.
Gwen John was born in Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire, South West Wales. One of her siblings was Augustus John, also an artist who I first heard off as the pub on the campus at the University of Liverpool is named after him (I had a few pints there when I was a student). Her mother died in 1884, when she was only 8 years old, a traumatic experience which is likely to have a major impact on her. The family moved to Tenby where she seems to have had a happy childhood despite the tragic loss.
She studied at the Slade School of Art, between 1895 and1898, and then moved to Paris, where she mingled with artists and became a model and lover of the sculptor Rodin. She moved to Meudon, a suburb of Paris. At the end of the affair with Rodin she withdrew into herself and eventually converted to Catholicism, which became a major influence on her work considering herself to be “God’s little artist”.
Her most well known paintings are of women, often seated and clasping their hands in front of them, and modest, domestic interiors. She is also noted for her pictures of cats and portraits of nuns. Her models were usually friends that she knew well, although the identities of most of her models are unknown. The model in the Manchester blue girl picture is a ‘Meudon neighbour’, who sat for her more than 60 times. The subjects of her paintings reflected her solitary lifestyle in Meudon. However, the exhibition showed other, less well known aspects of her work.
So, back to the Manchester painting of the girl in blue. Here it is.
It was hung on a wall along with five other versions of the same model, in the same blue dress, sat in the same chair, with the same posture reading the same letter (or, sometimes, a book), but with some relatively slight differences. I’d seen another one of these pictures, known as the Convalescent at the Fitzwilliam Gallery in Cambridge.
In fact there are eleven versions of this “convalescent”, illustrating a particular aspect of Johns’ work – painting multiple variants of a subject, or composition, something that suggests an obsessive nature, to say the least.
Here’s the same girl in the same dress. A slightly different pose and no letter or book
Oh, and here she is again, this time holding a cat – felines being another obsession, both in real life and in her paintings.
Here are a few favourites from the exhibition illustrating the different aspects of her works (I haven’t included any of her numerous portraits of nuns. I’m sorry, but they give me the creeps.)
And some little water colours from church congregations
These are just a small selection from a very comprehensive collection of works.
Where does she fit in the world of art? After all we do like to categorise and pigeonhole, don’t we?. Her work is figurative but their are elements of abstraction too. For me she was clearly influenced by the Impressionists. Some of her portraits have similarities to theirs. The Girl in Profile particularly reminds me of a Renoir portrait (I can’t quite recall which one off hand, though). But she has moved beyond them, although not as radically as the likes of Paul Cézanne, for example. Some experts, who know much more about these things than I do, have suggested similarities with Whistler in her use of colour, which she may have picked up when she studied with him for a while in Paris.
It’s an excellent exhibition and I’m glad I made the effort to walk across Edinburgh to see it. For many years she was in the shadow of her brother, Augustus, but who’s heard of him now? (Well plenty of students in Liverpool know his name, but if they were like me when I studied there, wouldn’t have a clue about what he did). I think she was far the better artist.
(P.S. Hopefully that picture will be back in Manchester soon 😂)


























































































































































































































