Max Gate

2012-07-18 13.14.22

This is the house where Thomas Hardy lived from 1885 until his death in 1928.  He designed it himself – he trained as an architect – and it was built by his father and brother who were builders with Hardy supervising the project. So it was very much a family affair.

It’s on the edge of Dorchester, just a couple of miles from the small cottage where he was born and raised and where he lived until he moved into the new house.


It’s a relatively modest Victorian villa with no particularly outstanding features. It was originally built as a “two up two down” with rooms on either side of a central hallway, and is set in quite pleasant, but not particularly extensive, grounds. As he became more wealthy following the success of his novels, he extended the house, building out at the back. The extension can be seen on the following picture.


Like his birthplace, the house is now owned by the National Trust as it was left to them by Hardy’s sister. It’s only partly accessible; a condition of the legacy was that Max Gate should be let out and the rent used to preserve and support his birthplace. Today, the tenants occupy more than half the rooms in house, the remainder being open to visits by the public.

Inside the Trust has furnished those rooms accessible to the public in a style representative of the period and probably gives a good impression of how a prosperous, upper middle class Victorian household would look. Although very little of the furniture belonged to Hardy, they have acquired some pieces on loan from Dorset County Museum, including this bookcase – bureau which stands in the corner of the dining room.


There are also a couple of his dining chairs and as you are allowed to touch the furniture and sit in the chairs around the house (a change from the usual policy of “keep your hands (and backside!) off” I can actually say I’ve sat in a chair that Thomas Hardy, and, possibly some of his well known visitors, once used.

The central hallway had a grandfather clock that was very similar to one shown in a photograph taken while Hardy lived there.


The Drawing room, to the right of the hall, is surprisingly bright and airy, due to the windows being much larger than those in most Victorian houses.


It was here that he’d entertain visitors, including Robert Louis Stevenson, H G Wells, Robert Graves, Siegfried Sasoon, George Bernard Shaw, Gustav Holst and Virginia Woolf. There’s a small conservatory built on to the side of the room – one of the later additions.

The fireplace has the original Delft tiles set in the surround. I’m not sure whether the mirror was also owned by Hardy.


There was only limited access to the upstairs – just two of the three  rooms that Hardy used as studies and where he wrote works including, Jude the Obscure, The Mayor of Casterbridge, Tess of the D’Urbervilles, short stories and poems. The contents of his study were removed after he died and are now in the Dorset County Museum in Dorchester.

This is the second room he used as his study. It’s quite spacious and overlooks the garden. I could happily work there!



The third, and final, room used as a study is not accessible.

One of the things I found most interesting was that his first wife used to spend much of her time in the attic, where she had a small room, painting, reading and sewing. It appears she was a bit of an odd ball and that their relationship was  strained. The wife in the attic – reminds me of something!!


6 thoughts on “Max Gate

    • I can’t say I’ve read any of his works. I love Polanski’s film of Tess of the d’Urbevilles with Natashja Kinski but it is a gloomy story and there’s always been something else I’ve wanted to read so never got round to reading his novel.

  1. Both houses look interesting and I would have enjoyed seeing them, particularly as I am a fan of Hardy’s work even though I agree that it is not cheerful reading. I remember wanting to read Jude the Obscure for a third time and then thinking: ‘no, I can’t put myself through all that pain again’. When I was into the 19th c. novel in a big way though, I used to love reading his books and felt that I knew Wessex as well as the area I lived in…

    • He’s one of those authors I know I ought to read, but have never got round to it, especially as I know his novels aren’t very cheerful. Having said that, I have read several of Zola’s novels, Germinal is a particular favourite, but also La Bête humaine and L’Assommoir, and they don’t happy happy endings to put it mildly!

      • I was so into Zola in my late teens! I had forgotten all about him! Thanks for reminding me.

        There should be no ‘ought’ when it comes to reading, not really! One should read what one enjoys. I was into the 19th c novel in a big way, but now only want to read contemporary things: I am into the ‘now’, new trends, and curious about the way people view the world (and the past) today. And that is o.k. I think.

        Similarly, I used to feel that I ought to finish a book even if I was not enjoying it but now I think: ‘why?’ Life is too short….

      • Zola is a must for any young Socialist!

        And I agree, Eirene, reading fiction should be for enjoyment, not a duty. But I still feel guilty for not reading Hardy ….!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.